Here's Jeff K.:
Reading David Carr's excellent profile of Neil Young in the Times prompted me to spend a good part of Sunday morning
listening to a series of Neil Young bootlegs, highlighting his live
performances and best recordings from 1966 to last year. More than forty
years after they were recorded, his early songs still seem fresh and
interesting to me and I can still feed off the energy of a live
performance of "Sea of Madness" from 1970. Yes, as Carr and everyone
else points out, Young isn't the most consistent writer, but his highs
easily set standards that have rarely been matched or surpassed, and he
is a true artist, willing to put himself out there on a limb and fail,
if it means being true to himself.
Earlier this week, Soundsource sent this to me:
His longtime manager and friend Elliot Roberts describes Young as “always willing to roll the dice and lose” and says: “He has no problem with failure as long as he is doing work he is happy with. Whether it ends up as a win or loss on a consumer level is not as much of an interest to him as one might think.”
Back to Jeff K.:
Earlier this week, Soundsource sent this to me:
His longtime manager and friend Elliot Roberts describes Young as “always willing to roll the dice and lose” and says: “He has no problem with failure as long as he is doing work he is happy with. Whether it ends up as a win or loss on a consumer level is not as much of an interest to him as one might think.”
Back to Jeff K.:
I need some time to weigh in. I'll be back. In the meantime....